Legal Opinion

Chewning v. Palmer

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1982No. 15834PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

This is an appeal from the granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Wallace D. Chewning against E. Payne Palmer III, the alleged guarantor of a $10,000 corporate debenture. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 19(e), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.

We need answer only one question on appeal and that is: Was there a genuine issue of material fact whether Chewning forbore suit in reliance upon the promise of Palmer to pay the amount due on the debenture?

The facts necessary for a determination of this issue are as follows. In 1971,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Antwerp Diamond Exchange of America, Inc. v. Better Business Bureau of Maricopa County, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Waugh v. LennardArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Boyle v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Weiner v. RomleyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. J. H. Queal & Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Double AA Builders, Ltd. v. Grand State Construction L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  2. Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. GMAC InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2004
  3. Diaz-Amador v. Wells Fargo Home MortgagesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012
  4. Armando Valles v. County of PimaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Jake's Granite Supplies, L.L.C. v. SNS Civil Design Consultants, Inc. (In Re Jake's Granite Supplies, L.L.C.)District Court, D. Arizona · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API