Legal Opinion

Yuma National Bank v. Balsz

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1925No. Civil No. 2291PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Superior Judge.

This action is upon eight promissory notes from appellee (hereafter called defendant) to appellant (hereafter called plaintiff), to which defendant jfieaded want of consideration. The trial was before a jury, which resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant; hence this appeal.

On March 20, 1919, one Deyo, his wife, and defendant jointly made to plaintiff two notes for $1,000 each, payable one and" two years after date. On December 29, 1920, the defendant alone made to plaintiff in lieu of one of the original notes, which with interest was then due, four notes…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fire Ins. Assn., Ltd. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Philpot v. GruningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Williams v. HasshagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Southwest Cotton Co. v. RyanArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Pacific Railways Advertising Co. v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Demasse v. ITT Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Mohave County v. Mohave-Kingman Estates, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Selaster v. SimmonsArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Pejsa v. BridgesArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Knoebel v. Chief Pontiac, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API