Legal Opinion
Prentiss-Wabers Stove Co. v. Millers Mutual Fire Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 3, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed January 11, 1927:
Rosenberry, J.
Upon the trial as well as in briefs of counsel and upon the oral argument here it was freely conceded by all parties that the bills of sale executed by the plaintiff to Searls and Wiltrout were in legal effect chattel mortgages and should be treated and considered as such in determining the rights of parties.
It was argued on behalf of the Concordia Company and the Northern Company, which issued the so-called trustee policies, that the chattel mortgages were invalid because the description of the property mortgaged was ambulatory…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brecht v. Law, Union & Crown Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- Lumbermen's National Bank of Menominee v. CorriganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Kitch v. Northwestern National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Bloomer v. Cicero Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Molle v. Kewaskum Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by8 opinions
- Frozine v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Moe v. Allemannia Fire Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Ensz v. Brown Insurance AgencyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Employers' Fire Insurance v. British America Assurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Ottens v. Atlas Assurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.