Legal Opinion
Brecht v. Law, Union & Crown Ins.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 2, 1908No. 1,488PublishedCited by 29 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Oregon.
1Opinion of the Court
DF HAVEN, District Judge.
This action was brought to recover the sum of $7,500 and interest claimed to be due under two policies of insurance against loss by fire issued by the defendant, the Daw, Union & Crown Insurance Company, to the St. Johns Lumber Company, upon certain property described in said policies. One policy is for $5,000, dated October 5, 1904, and the other for $3,500, dated May 19, 1905, and both contain the following provisions:
“This entire policy, unless otherwise provided, by agreement indorsed hereon or added hereto, shall be void * * * if the interest of the insured be *400‘"r…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Syndicate Ins. v. BohnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Grosvenor v. . the Atlantic Fire Insurance Co. of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Delaware Ins. v. GreerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Queen Insurance v. Dearborn Savings, Loan & Building Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Welch v. British American Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Germania Fire Insurance v. BallyArizona Supreme Court · 1918
- Royal Insur. Co. v. DruryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. RuddyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Southern States Fire & Casualty Insurance v. NapierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Girard Et Ux. v. Vt. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.