Legal Opinion

Moe v. Allemannia Fire Insurance Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed October 11, 1932:

Rosenberry, C. J.

The policy contained a clause as follows :

“Chattel mortgage. Unless otherwise provided by agreement in writing added hereto, this company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any property insured hereunder while incumbered by a chattel mortgage, and during the time of such incumbrance this company shall be liable only for loss or damage to any other property insured hereunder.” Standard fire insurance policy, lines 62-67.

The trial court was of the opinion that the situation was saved by the provisions of sec. 209.06 (1),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Olson v. Herman Farmers Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Collum v. National Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Prentiss-Wabers Stove Co. v. Millers Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fountain v. Importers & Exporters InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Emmco Insurance v. Palatine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Riteway Carriers, Inc. v. Stuyvesant Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  4. Summers v. Oakfield Town Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Estreen v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API