Legal Opinion

Petock v. Asante

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2011No. CC 08104117; CA A141216; SC S059046PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

A worker who suffers a “compensable injury” may seek compensation for the injury and, for three years following the injury, also may demand reinstatement to his or her former position of employment. See Armstrong v. Rogue Federal Credit Union, 328 Or 154, 161, 969 P2d 382 (1998). Additionally, for five years following the injury, the worker may seek compensation if the condition resulting from the injury worsens. ORS 656.273. The primary question in this case is whether a workplace injury that plaintiff characterized, in filing a workers’ compensation claim, as an aggravation or worsening of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. ZRZ Realty Co. v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. SAIF Corp. v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Keller v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Interstate Roofing, Inc. v. Springville Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Eklof v. StewardOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Cocchiara v. Lithia Motors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Kelley v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. Davis v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
  5. Cocchiara v. Lithia Motors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API