Legal Opinion
Pauley v. Lummus Construction
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 11, 1992No. 78743PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSEN, Vice Chief Judge:
Petitioner (Claimant) seeks review of an order by a three judge panel of the Workers’ Compensation Court. The panel’s order modified the trial courts’ order, in relevant part, by reducing the percentage of binaural hearing loss for which Claimant was entitled to compensation. We sustain the order.
Claimant went to work for Respondent (Lummus) as a construction general foremen in May 1989. At that time he had worked in the construction industry for approximately forty years. He had been exposed to loud noise during the entire course of his employment, including…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Parks v. Flint Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Utica Square Salon of Beauty v. BarronCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
3Cited by14 opinions
- Oklahoma Petroleum Workers' Compensation Ass'n v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Celestica Inc. v. HinesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
- Kerr Glass Co. v. WilsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Parks v. Kerr GlassCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Keco, Inc. v. HaywardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.