Legal Opinion

UNITE HERE Local 1 v. Ruprecht Company

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 7, 2022No. 1:20-cv-05158Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION United Here, Local 1, Plaintiff, Case No. 20-cv-5158 v. Judge Mary M. Rowland Ruprecht Company, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff United Here, Local 1 sues Defendant Ruprecht Company to compel arbitration of six grievances that Plaintiff’s union members filed against Defendant pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement. Defendant denies that the grievances are arbitrable under the agreement’s arbitration clause. The parties have now cross- moved for summary judgment [23]; [26]. For the reasons…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Skiba v. Ill. Cent. R.R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API