Davar Products, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rao, Chief Judge:
This protest places in issue the classification as an entirety of an importation invoiced as “B/O Carver w/out Battery”. The article in question was classified as a knife with other than fixed blade, valued at more than $6 per dozen, as provided for in paragraph 354 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, and was assessed with duty at the rate of 17% cents each and 27% per centum ad valorem.
Plaintiff claims that the importation consists of two components, the one properly classifiable as an article…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Columbia Shipbuilding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- Astra Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Silvine Importers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Sheldon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nissho American Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Oxford International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
- Transamerican Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- North America Foreign Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Novelty Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971