Guggenheim v. Kirchhofer
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
in Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This was an action by Paul Kirchhofer, Ferdinand Kirchhofer, Bernard Huber, and Max Hoffman, copartners as Ulrich de Gasp Yon Wilier, against Meyer Guggenheim, Isaac Guggenheim, Daniel Guggenheim, Morris Guggenheim, and Solomon Guggenheim, co-partners as M. Guggenheim’s Sons. There was a judgment in the circuit court for the plaintiffs. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs iu error were defendants in the court below, and bring this writ of error to review a judgment for the plaintiffs, entered upon the verdict of a jury, by the direction of the court.
The" action was brought by the plaintiffs to recover back the amount of certain royalties paid by the plaintiffs to the defendants during" the years 1889, 1890, and 1891, under a contract of the date of May 16, 1889. On that date the defendants made a contract with the plaintiffs, whereby they licensed the plaintiffs for .a term of years to use certain embroidery stamps. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Sweet v. . TuttleNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Ressequie v. ByersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- White v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
3Cited by6 opinions
- JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Datatreasury CorporaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Huber v. GuggenheimU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1898
- Core Laboratories, Inc. v. Hayward-Wolff Research Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1957
- Hooker Chemical Corp. v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1964
- City of Milwaukee v. Shailer & Schniglau Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.