Legal Opinion
Hooker Chemical Corp. v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided September 18, 1964No. Civ. 4412PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAILEY BROWN, District Judge.
Nature of Action
This is an actjon on a written licensing agreement seeking to recover royalties and seeking other relief. Under this Agreement, entered into in 1951, Hooker Chemical Corp. (Hooker) licensed to Yelsicol Chemical Corp. (Velsicol) the “Know-How of Hooker” and “Licensed Patent Rights” of Hooker to make hexachlor ocyclopentadiene. (Hexachlorocyclopentadiene is frequently referred to in the record and will be referred to in this memorandum decision as “hex” or “C56”, C56 being a trade name of Hooker.) It is the contention of the plaintiff, Hooker, that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- AO Smith Corporation v. Petroleum Iron Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- The Maytag Company, a Corporation v. The Murray Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Casco Products Corporation v. Sinko Tool & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Eastern Electric, Inc. v. Seeburg CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Oldnar Corporation v. Sanyo North America CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2022