Sweet v. . Tuttle
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The first question is, whether a defendant, along with other defences, may set up in his answer the non-joinder of other parties who ought to have been sued with him. Under the former practice, the non-joinder of defendants could be pleaded only in abatement, and could not be joined with a plea in bar; but under the Code there is no…
2Cited by41 opinions
- Frear v. . SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Sheldon v. . EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Greenup v. CrooksIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Lillis v. Emigrant Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Hackney v. Raymond Bros. Clarke Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1903
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.