Legal Opinion

Core Laboratories, Inc. v. Hayward-Wolff Research Corp.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 9, 1957No. 32PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wolcott, J.:

This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court entered in an action for a declaratory judgment granting the motion of Hay ward-Wolff Research Corp., appellee, (hereafter Hayward) for summary judgment, and denying a similar motion of Core Laboratories, Inc., appellant, (hereafter Core).

The controversy between the parties arises over the liability of Core to Hayward for the payment of royalties under an agreement licensing Core to use certain patents owned by Hayward covering methods and apparatus for the logging of oil wells.

There is no issue of fact between the parties, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. De Forest Radio Telephone Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Raytheon Manufacturing Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. St. Joseph Iron Works v. Farmers Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  4. Universal Oil Products Co. v. Vickers Petroleum Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1941
  5. Duval Sulphur & Potash Company v. Potash Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tekelec, Incorporated v. Verint Systems, IncorporaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  2. Plastic Contact Lens Co. v. Guaranteed Contact Lenses, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  3. Tekelec, Incorporated v. Verint Systems, IncorporaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API