Legal Opinion

State v. Yardley

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 4, 2004No. 20030556-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

2Per curiam

¶1 Kevin Yardley entered a conditional guilty plea during de novo proceedings in district court following his justice court conviction. The conditional plea sought to preserve a right to appeal an issue that would not otherwise have been appealable under Utah Code section 78-5-120(7) (2002). The State moves to dismiss the appeal because the district court did not rule on the constitutionality of a statute or ordinance.1

¶2 Section 78-5-120(7) states that "[the decision of the district court [in a case originating in a justice court] is final and may not be appealed unless…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Varian-Eimac, Inc. v. LamoreauxCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. State v. HinsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  3. Draper City v. RoperCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ogden City v. DeckerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  2. Provo City v. FackrellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  3. Cedar City v. DoveCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  4. Ogden City v. DeckerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  5. Ogden City v. DeckerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API