State v. Yardley
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
2Per curiam
¶1 Kevin Yardley entered a conditional guilty plea during de novo proceedings in district court following his justice court conviction. The conditional plea sought to preserve a right to appeal an issue that would not otherwise have been appealable under Utah Code section 78-5-120(7) (2002). The State moves to dismiss the appeal because the district court did not rule on the constitutionality of a statute or ordinance.1
¶2 Section 78-5-120(7) states that "[the decision of the district court [in a case originating in a justice court] is final and may not be appealed unless…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Varian-Eimac, Inc. v. LamoreauxCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- State v. HinsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
- Draper City v. RoperCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
4Cited by6 opinions
- Ogden City v. DeckerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Provo City v. FackrellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Cedar City v. DoveCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
- Ogden City v. DeckerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Ogden City v. DeckerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.