Legal Opinion

State v. Hinson

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 24, 1998No. 971638-CAPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIS, Presiding Judge:

The State appeals the trial court’s order and judgment granting defendants a trial de novo as a result of their appeal from the justice court and dismissing the case because of the State’s failure to provide discovery in a timely manner. We affirm.

FACTS

On August 31, 1996, the State filed an information in the justice court of the Dutch John Precinct charging defendants with the unlawful possession of both a controlled substance and drug paraphernalia. See Utah Code Ann. §§ 58-37-8(2)(a)(i) (1996) (amended 1997) & 58-37a-5(l) (1996). Defendant Cynthia Hinson was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Monticello v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. University of Utah v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Ferro v. Utah Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  4. Reedeker v. SalisburyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  5. State v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. West Jordan City v. GoodmanUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Dean v. HenriodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  3. Pleasant Grove City v. OrvisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  4. South Salt Lake City v. TerkelsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  5. Lucero v. KennardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API