Legal Opinion

Draper City v. Roper

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 18, 2003No. 20030480-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

2Per curiam

1 Defendant Daniel Roper appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea in abeyance, following a hearing de novo, in a case originating in justice court. This case is before the court on its own motion for summary dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. See Utah R.App. P. 10(e).

112 "A defendant convicted and sentenced in justice court is entitled to a hearing de novo in the district court ... if he files a notice of appeal within 30 days of ... an order denying a motion to withdraw a plea." Utah Code Ann. § 78-5-120(8)(d) (2002). "The…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Varian-Eimac, Inc. v. LamoreauxCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. City of Monticello v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Dean v. HenriodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. YardleyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
  2. State v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
  3. State v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API