Legal Opinion

Provo City v. Fackrell

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided January 20, 2012No. 20110850-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

2Per curiam

{1 Daniel Fackrell appeals his conviction of driving a vehicle without a valid driver Hcense, a class C misdemeanor, following de novo proceedings in the district court on appeal from a conviction in the Provo City Justice Court. This case is before the court on a sua sponte motion for summary disposition.

{2 When a case originates in a justice court, a defendant may appeal the judgment and conviction from the justice court to the district court. See Utah Code Ann. § 78A-7-118(1) (Supp.2011) (providing that a defendant is entitled to a trial de novo in district court if the defendant…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Varian-Eimac, Inc. v. LamoreauxCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. State v. HinsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  3. City of Kanab v. GuskeyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  4. State v. YardleyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Provo City v. FackrellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API