Legal Opinion

Poorbaugh v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 9, 1993No. 91-1457 LPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment. Plaintiffs alleged that defendant’s negligent actions caused injury to and loss of their property and constituted a taking of their property. Defendant challenged plaintiffs’ complaint based on a lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim.

*630I. Facts

Plaintiffs, Fred W. Poorbaugh and Ruth E. Poorbaugh, are the owners 1 of a twenty acre tract of land situated within and surrounded by the Carson National Forest in Rio Arriba County, New…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hansen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. BMR Gold Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  3. Boling v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  4. Moden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Mekuria v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API