Legal Opinion
Mekuria v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 30, 1997No. Civil Action 96-866(GK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Amended Motion to Dismiss [# 16]. 1 Having considered Defendant’s Motion, Plaintiffs Opposition, Defendant’s Reply, Plaintiffs Surreply, the contentions of counsel at oral argument, 2 and the entire record herein, the Court denies Defendant’s Motion for the reasons set forth below.
Plaintiffs Bisrat Mekuria, Tewidros Está-fanos, Ace Cash Express, Inc., Ghirmai Ghe-bremichel, George Beckford, Carlton Henry and Francis Fabrizio, Jr., who own and operate small neighborhood businesses in the Petworth area,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tapio Investment Co. I v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Air Line Pilots v. Pan AmericanDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2004
- Kiasantana, LLC v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of OregonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
- O’Neill v. Valley Reg. Health CareDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2001