Legal Opinion
Boling v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 27, 1998No. Nos. 93-84 L, 94-140 L to 94-165 LPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON RECONSIDERATION FOLLOWING TRIAL *
WIESE, Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On September 8, 1997, this court issued an opinion in the present case deciding, among other issues, that certain of the plaintiffs were barred by the statute of limitations from pursuing compensation under the Fifth Amendment for the Government’s alleged taking, through an ongoing process of bank erosion, of portions of their individually-owned properties located along the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in Horry County, South Carolina. Boling v. United States, 38 Fed.Cl. 705 (1997). The ruling against the plaintiffs was…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Boling v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Hansen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Kingsport Horizontal Property Regime v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.