Legal Opinion

Moden v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 9, 2004No. 01-294 LPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSH, Judge.

This takings case is currently before the court on defendant’s Revised Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment, and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof and Exhibits Thereto. For the reasons set forth herein, defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby granted for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because the court dismisses plaintiffs’ action for jurisdictional reasons, the court finds it unnecessary to address defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

BACKGR…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Hansen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Central Pines Land Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Nicholson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. All Florida Network Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API