Legal Opinion

Conder v. Griffith

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1916No. 8,981PublishedCited by 30 opinions

From Superior Court of Marion County (91,108); Pliny W. Bartholomew, Judge. Action by Howard Griffith against Croel P. Conder. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment obtained by appellee against appellant for personal injuries, alleged to have been caused by appellant’s, negligence in driving his automobile into and against appellee while he was crossing a street in the city of *220Indianapolis. The errors assigned and relied on for reversal are, the overruling of appellant’s motions for judgment on the answers to interrogatories and for a new trial.

The complaint was in two paragraphs on which issues were joined by general denial. The facts disclosed by the complaint are as follows: On May 1, 1912, appellee was employed by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Penso v. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Indiana Railway Co. v. MaurerIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Mercer v. CorbinIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. MathewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Northern Indiana Transit, Inc. v. BurkIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Jones v. CaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Larkins v. KohlmeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Peigh v. Baltimore & O. R. CoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  5. Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo BrotherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API