Armstead v. Lounsberry
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for St. Louis county to recover $675.33 for damage to plaintiff’s automobile caused by defendant’s negligence. Tbe answer set up a counterclaim for $1,220. Tbe Insurance Company of North America intervened.
Read the full summary
Action in tbe district court for St. Louis county to recover $675.33 for damage to plaintiff’s automobile caused by defendant’s negligence. Tbe answer set up a counterclaim for $1,220. Tbe Insurance Company of North America intervened. Tbe case was tried before Dibell, J., wbo denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and plaintiff’s motion for an instruction to tbe jury that defendant could not recover upon bis counterclaim because of bis negligence, and a jury wbicb returned'a verdict for $68.51 in favor of plaintiff and against tbe intervener on its claim. Defendant’s motion for…
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
Plaintiff and defendant Lounsberry, each driving an automobile, came into collision on London road in Duluth. Both sustained some damage. Each lays tbe whole blame on tbe other. Plaintiff sued to recover bis damage from defendant. Defendant bad insurance in intervener insurance company, and intervener paid to him tbe amount of bis damage and in this action it asks to be reimbursed by plaintiff. Tbe court submitted tbe case to tbe jury and a verdict was rendered for plaintiff. Tbe jury must have found defendant negligent and *36plaintiff free from negligence. Defendant and intervener contend the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bourne v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Philadelphia, Wilmington, & Baltimore Railroad v. Philadelphia & Havre De Grace Steam Towboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Dudley v. Northampton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Chase v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Sutton v. Town of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Stack v. General Baking Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- American Automobile Ins. Co. v. StruweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo BrotherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Phillips-Buttorff Manufacturing Co. v. McAlexanderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.