Legal Opinion

Lander v. Gilman

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1967PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. Irwin Shapiro, J.

This is a motion by the defendants Harry L. G-ilman, Kate G-ilman, Shirley Bomber and George G-ilman to dismiss the first and second causes of action in the complaint on the ground that the one-year Statute of Limitations applicable to an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution bars the maintenance of said causes of action, and to strike from the third cause of action the incorporation by reference therein of the allegations contained in the first and second causes of action.

Service of the summons and complaint in this action was made on the moving defendants during the month of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marks v. . TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Cary v. . KoernerNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Assets Collecting Co. v. MyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  4. Nebenzahl v. TownsendNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1881
  5. Chance v. Guaranty Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moran v. KlatzkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Riverhead Park Corp. v. CardinaleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  3. Karen v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1981
  4. Spinale v. GuestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Lombardo v. County of NassauNew York Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API