Legal Opinion

Riverhead Park Corp. v. Cardinale

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 26, 2012No. 07-CV-4133 (ADS)(ARL)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

The Plaintiffs Riverhead Park Corp. (“RPC”), Stanley Blumenstein, and Laurence Oxman commenced this action against the Town of Riverhead (“Town”) and, individually, against Philip Cardinale, George Bartunek, Barbara Blass, Leroy E. Barnes, Dawn C. Thomas, and Rose Sanders (“the Defendants”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 42 U.S.C. § 1985, alleging conspiracy and violations of the Plaintiffs’ procedural due process rights, substantive due process rights, and equal protection rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Defendant…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Abraham v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  2. Eberle v. Town of SouthamptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  3. Shearon v. Comfort Tech Mechanical Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  4. Altman Stage Lighting, Inc. v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  5. Board of Trustees of the Local Union No. 373 United Assocation of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry Benefit Funds v. Mid Orange Mechanical Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API