Legal Opinion
Lombardo v. County of Nassau
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
F. Dana Winslow, J.
Plaintiffs motion to amend his notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (6), and defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (1) (a), are determined as follows.
This is an action in which plaintiff seeks to recover damages sustained as a result of the unlawful retention and forfeiture of his vehicle by the County of Nassau and the Nassau County Police Department (collectively, the County). On or about May 27, 1999, the County seized plaintiffs vehicle in connection with plaintiffs arrest…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kronos, Inc. v. AVX Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Vigilant Insurance of America v. Housing Authority of El PasoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Marks v. . TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Snyder v. Town Insulation, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- County of Nassau v. CanavanNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- 10 Ellicott Square Court Corp. v. Violet Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- SouthTrust Bank v. JONES, MORRISON, WOMACKCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Riverhead Park Corp. v. CardinaleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- 10 ELLICOTT SQUARE COURT CORPORATIO v. VIOLET REALTY, INC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011