Everett v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. McKinley, Judge. The facts are stated in the- opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
Upon further consideration of this cause in Bank, we adhere to the views expressed in the opinion filed in Department One, and, for the reasons therein given, the judgment and order are reversed.
*111Temple, J., dissenting.—I dissent. This action was for damages for the death of Charles E. Everett, which was caused by a car of defendant. The main question presented on this appeal is whether this court can say, as matter of law, that the deceased was guilty of negligence which contributed proximately to his injury, in the face of the verdict of the jury, which is in favor of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Creamer v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Harlan v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- Holmes v. South Pacific Coast RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Harlan v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co v. CrolyIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.