Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 23, 1983No. 462-82CPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GIBSON, Judge:

This is a suit arising under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (Supp. V 1981) (CDA),1 which comes before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Jurisdiction in this court is based on 41 U.S.C. § 609(a)(1) (Supp. V 1981), the “direct access”, provision of the CDA.2

For reasons appearing below, the court elects to treat defendant’s motion for summary judgment as a motion to dismiss. Because this court is without jurisdiction in this matter on account of plaintiff’s failure to certify its contract claim before the contracting officer,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. Vogel Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Mortensen v. First Federal Savings And Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  5. James B. Stanley v. Central Intelligence Agency United States Department of Defense U.S. ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Youngdale & Sons Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Raymark Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  3. Hedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  4. Metzger, Shadyac & Schwartz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  5. Biagioli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API