Legal Opinion

Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. Warrick

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 28, 1941PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, Chief Justice,

delivering the majority opinion of the Court:

On March 18, 1932, receivers were appointed for Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Company, hereafter referred to as Mokan.

*389Several attorneys filed petitions for allowances to be made them for services rendered the estate, and for expenses necessarily incurred, each stipulating that no appeal would be taken, or application would be made for rehearing, in respect of any decision made by the Chancellor.

The receivers had sued Columbia Gas and Electric Corporation, et al., for damages in the Federal Court for the District of Delaware, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. R. H. McWilliams, Jr., Co. v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1936
  2. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. WarrickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  3. Simon v. New Jersey Asphalt & Paving Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
  4. Crawford's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Wither's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1851

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Summa Corp. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  2. Moffitt v. CarrollSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  3. Allan Christian v. Mary O. JosephCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. IN THE MATTER OF THE ASSESSMENTS FOR TAX YEAR 2012 OF CERTAIN PROPERTIESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
  5. Slater v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API