City of Cincinnati v. Vester
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.
In March, 1928, the appellant, City of Cincinnati, by its council, passed an ordinance to appropriate a strip of land 25 feet in width adjacent to the south line of Pifth street for the purpose of " widening the street. By the same ordinance the city undertook to condemn additional areas adjacent to this strip, on the south side thereof, between Main and Pike streets) the intersecting streets being Lawson Alley, Sycamore, Broadway, McAllister, and Lawrence. The appellees brought separate suits in the district court to enjoin the city from condemning their properly lying…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Clark v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Hairston v. Danville & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Davis v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Piedmont Triad Regional Water Authority v. Sumner Hills Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- Cuglar v. Power AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- HTK Management, L.L.C. v. Seattle Popular Monorail AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Htk Management v. Seattle Monorail Auth.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.