Legal Opinion
Cuglar v. Power Authority
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 14, 1957PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPaul D. Graves, J.
Plaintiffs, in each of the five above-entitled actions, were owners of lands appropriated in the name of the State by the defendant Superintendent of Public Works at the request of, and for use by, the defendant Power Authority. The appropriations were made pursuant to subdivision 10 of section 1007 of the Public Authorities Law, and section 30 of the Highway Law. In these actions plaintiffs seek to have part of their property restored. Defendants, by the present motions, attack the complaints for legal insufficiency.
The lands of each plaintiff now lie immediately adjacent to the banks of the…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United States v. CarmackSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Dowling College v. FlackeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Saso v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Broadway Schenectady Entertainment, Inc. v. County of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- County of Orange v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1971
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.