Legal Opinion

Office of Consumer Counsel v. Department of Public Utility Control

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided November 21, 1994No. File 528093PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMaloney, J.

The plaintiff, the state office of consumer counsel, is appealing a decision of the defendant department of public utility control (department) concerning a power outage at the Millstone 3 nuclear power generating facility, which is owned and operated by the defendant Connecticut Light, and Power Company and its affiliates (company). The plaintiff is a state agency, and its appeal is authorized under General Statutes §§ 16-2a and 4-183. The court finds in favor of the plaintiff.

On July 15, 1991, the company was forced to shut down its Millstone 3 nuclear power plant after it discovered that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Trw, Inc. And Its Unincorporated Division, Trw Credit DataCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Burnham v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. No., Colorado Attorney General Reports1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API