Legal Opinion
Pet v. Department of Health Services
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 8, 1994No. 14657PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The dispositive issue in this administrative appeal is whether the trial court properly refused to supplement the record with evidence of alleged procedural irregularities to establish a violation of the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (UAPA), and, specifically, General Statutes (Rev. to 1985) § 4-179.1 *653The defendant Connecticut department of health services (department) brought charges against the plaintiff, Donald Pet, a psychiatrist, alleging certain violations of General Statutes (Rev. to 1985) § 20-13c2 in relation to his psychiatric treatment of four female patients. The defendant…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- State v. VitaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- State v. ChanceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Grayson v. Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin & KurianskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Ann Howard's Apricots Restaurant, Inc. v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Loomis Institute v. Town of WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Johnson v. Department of Public HealthConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.