Legal Opinion

Gudmundson v. Del Ozone

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2010No. 20080537PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEHRING, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 This appeal comes from a district court’s grant of summary judgment on Ms. Gudmundson’s claims against third parties for injuries she sustained in the workplace. Ms. Gudmundson, a former employee of the Utah State Prison, claims that ozone exposure from a newly installed ozone-laundry system injured her, causing significant brain injuries.

¶ 2 Ms. Gudmundson initially sought workers’ compensation benefits. The Utah Labor Commission denied her claim because it concluded there was no causal link between her condition and her employment. In her subsequent civil…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. MacRis & Associates, Inc. v. Neways, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Zaza v. Marquess and Nell, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. Daniels v. Gamma West Brachytherapy, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Grundberg v. Upjohn Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Gressman v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Moss v. Parr Waddoups Brown Gee & LovelessUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. HorneUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. A.S. v. R.S.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Smith v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 2017

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API