Webster v. Hennepin County
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LILLEHAUG, Justice.
Appellant Tony Webster sought public government data from respondents Henne-pin County and the Hennepin County *291Sheriffs Office (collectively, Hennepin County) under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (the Data Practices Act). See Minn. Stat. ch. 13 (2016). Dissatisfied with Hennepin County’s response, Webster filed a complaint with the Office of Administrative Hearings. The administrative law judge (ALJ) held that Henne-pin County had violated the Data Practices Act and ordered it to produce all requested data. Hennepin County appealed the decision and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Service Employees International Union Local 1 v. HustedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- State & Port Authority v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- DRJ, INC. v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
3Cited by1 opinion
- Webster v. Hennepin Cnty.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018