Legal Opinion

United States v. Mueffelman

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 26, 2004No. 1:01-cv-10387PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT’S DECISION IN BLAKELY v. WASHINGTON

GERTNER, District Judge.

The defendants in the above cases, like literally thousands across the country, challenge the sentence the government seeks under Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (June 24, 2004). They argue that any sentencing enhancement authorized by the United States Sentencing Guidelines (hereinafter “Federal Sentencing Guidelines,” “Sentencing Guidelines,” or “Guidelines”) violates the Sixth Amendment insofar as it permits a judge to find facts that are…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. MueffelmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. PimentalDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  3. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2005
  4. United States v. ShieldsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  5. United States v. EmmeneggerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API