Legal Opinion

Milaeger Well Drilling Co. v. Muskego Rendering Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCuRRiE, J.

The brief of the defendant states the questions to be determined on this appeal to be:(1) Did the plaintiff fulfil its contract ?(2) If the plaintiff did not fulfil the contract, did the defendant so conduct itself so as to waive such fulfilment?

With respect to the first question, it is defendant’s contention that the contract required the plaintiff to continue drilling operations until “sufficient water” was obtained, and the plaintiff has breached the contract by not doing so. Genni v. Hahn (1892), 82 Wis. 90, 51 N. W. 1096, is cited as authority holding that plaintiff cannot recover if it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wheelwright v. Pure Milk Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Guschl v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Genni v. HahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Markman v. HoeferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. National Merchandising Corporation v. McAlpinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API