Genni v. Hahn
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the County Court of Waukesha County. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtOetoN, J.
Tbe plaintiff agreed with the defendant to dig a well for him on bis farm for one dollar a foot for tbe first twenty feet, and after that for a quarter more for each foot. Tbe suit is for digging the well sixty-five feet deep at that price. It is alleged in tbe defendant’s answer that tbe contract was that the plaintiff “ was to furnish him with a sufficient supply of water (in said well)'for his stock and family.” On the trial tbe plaintiff, as a witness, testified that “ be.agreed with Hahn to furnish him a sufficient quan*91tity of water” in said well. “For. bis stock and family” may well be…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Ylijarvi v. BrockphalerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Andriola v. MilliganNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
- Milaeger Well Drilling Co. v. Muskego Rendering Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957