Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Howard

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided November 7, 1934No. 963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.

This action was instituted by the United States for the benefit of full-blood members of the Osage Tribe of Indians for the purpose of canceling conveyances and quieting the title to lands inherited by such full-blood members of the tribe from a deceased fullblosd Osage Indian. The land involved is in Osage county, OH., and is part of the original allotment of Wah-hrah-um-pah, full-blood restricted Osage Allottee No. 295, who died intestate on or about December 12,1911, without having received a certificate of competency. The deceased left surviving her,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Choate v. TrappSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. La Motte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Taylor v. TayrienCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  4. United States v. HaleDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1930
  5. United States v. HaleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MacAtee, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  2. Donelson v. OldfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API