Legal Opinion

United States v. Hale

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 21, 1931No. 421PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COTTERAL, Circuit Judge.

This suit was brought by the United States, in behalf of Pearl Bigheart, an Osage Indian ward, against Myrtie M. Hale, to quiet the title to a quarter section of land in Osage county, Okl. The District Court [39 F.(2d) 188] sustained the title of each to a half interest in the land, but the entire interest was awarded to the defendant in a final decree, from which the United States appeals.- We first review the material facts to which the parties agreed at the trial.

The land was allotted to Um-pah-to-kah, a full-blood Osage Indian, pursuant to the Allotment Act of June…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Brewer-Elliott Oil & Gas Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. United States v. BowlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Robinson v. FairSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. HowardDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apartments, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  3. Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apartments, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API