Legal Opinion

Donelson v. Oldfield

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 21, 1971No. 43843PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

The question presented in this appeal from the judgment of the District Court of Osage County, in which the facts are uncontradicted, is whether Section 3 of the Act of Congress of February 27, 1925, 43 Stat. 1008, had the effect of imposing restraints upon the alienation of lands in the hands of Osage Indian devisees, which lands had been free and clear of all restraints in the hands of the Osage Indian devisor. That section of the statute is as follows:

“Lands devised to members of the Osage Tribe of one-half or more Indian blood or who do not have certificates of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. La Motte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. HowardDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Cox v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Drummond v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Drummond v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Opinion No. 74-225 (1974) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1975
  4. Opinion No. 77-270 (1978) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API