Legal Opinion

A. Y. McDonald Manufacturing Co. v. Newstone

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 28, 1932No. 29,089PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered in favor of the defendant.

Plaintiff brought suit to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The court, at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, granted a motion to clismiss the action as to defendant Newstone. There was no motion for a new trial. There was a motion made to permit plaintiff to reopen the case and present additional evidence on one point, hereinafter to be noted. There are errors assigned as to rulings on evidence at the trial. These errors, if any, are not here for review because not excepted to at the trial or in a motion for a new trial.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hanley Co. v. Harney Valley Irr. Dist.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barrett v. HampeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. New Prague Lumber & Readi-Mix Co. v. BastyrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Kahle v. McClarySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Willard v. Max A. Kohen, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API