Legal Opinion

Dan Buckley v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 11, 1998No. Docket 96-9039PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge CALABRESI concurs in a separate opinion.

KEARSE, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff Dan Buckley appealed from a final judgment of the United states District Court for the Southern District of New York, Barrington D. Parker, Jr., Judge, dismissing his amended complaint which alleged that defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (“Con Edison” or the “company”), violated his rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA” or the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (1994), and the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law § 296 (McKinney 1993 & Supp.1998), in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kathleen Borkowski v. Valley Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. Dan Buckley v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. Buckley v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Kinneary v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Parry v. Mohawk Motors of Michigan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. Nielsen v. Moroni Feed CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Renaud v. Wyoming Department of Family ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. Stinnett v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API