Legal Opinion
Rahmati v. Mehri
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 30, 1982No. 10437), (10438PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
These cases arise out of open-ended oral arrangements under which two physicians were informally associated in the practice of ophthalmology in Danbury and New Milford for a period of two years. In the first case, the plaintiff, Dr. Iraj Rahmati, sued the defendant, Dr. Parviz Mehri, to recover moneys claimed to be due for services rendered. In the second case, in which the parties were reversed, Mehri. sued for reimbursement of shared expenses and to recover lost income. After a consolidated trial to the court, judgment was rendered for Rahmati in both cases, and Mehri took a timely appeal.
Th…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. FlammiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- DuBose v. CarabettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Otto Contracting Co. v. S. Schinella & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Lawson v. GodfriedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Finlay v. SwirskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Conference Center Ltd. v. TRC—The Research Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Fellows v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Presidential Capital Corp. v. RealeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Janusauskas v. FichmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Christensen v. Bic Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.