Legal Opinion

People v. Cross

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 1923No. Crim. No. 1007PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. W. B. Wallace, Judge. Reversed. The facts aré stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

Appellant was convicted of a misdemeanor, it being charged that on or about the eighth day of March, 1923, he willfully and unlawfully sold and furnished a quantity of morphine, contrary to the provisions of the act of March 26, 1907 (Stats. 1907, p. 124), as amended, regulating the sale of poisons.

[1] It is contended, first, that appellant’s challenges for cause should have been allowed by the court as to four jurors, because they had testified that they were prejudiced in narcotic cases. Three of such jurors did not serve upon the case, and hence no prejudicial error could result. In People…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. SanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  2. People v. KrompholdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. People v. SchaferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. People v. CordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. People v. BackusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. People v. WerweeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. People v. EddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. People v. LloydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API