Legal Opinion

People v. Martin

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 1948No. Crim. 711PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, Acting P. J.

Defendant was charged with the offense of murdering one Fred Buck. He entered a dual plea of not guilty, and not guilty by reason of insanity. Prior to trial, a doubt arose in the mind of the judge as to the sanity of the defendant. He appointed three alienists to examine him. (See Pen. Code, § 1368.) A trial by jury on this issue was not demanded. Defendant personally and through counsel waived such a trial. At the conclusion of the hearing defendant, on November 19, 1947, was held presently sane; that he was then capable of understanding the nature and object of the proceedings against him…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. People v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People v. OtteyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. People v. TrocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. People v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. People v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. MasseySupreme Court of Kansas · 1987

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API