Legal Opinion

People v. Eddy

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1954No. Crim. 5097PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Defendant, convicted of robbery, seeks a reversal on the grounds of (1) the insufficiency of the evidence, (2) deprivation of his liberty without due process of law, (3) admission of unlawful evidence, (4) rejection of offered instructions.

The Evidence Is Sufficient

Two associates of appellant, Dallas and Bernita Blumenthal, entered the Hofgaarden Medical Center, a hospital, in Alhambra, on December 7, 1952, near midnight. From the adopted evidence and the verdict, appellant had been treated at the Hofgaarden for an injury on December 1, 1952. He had supplied his confederates with the revolver…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. PeeteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. People v. FerdinandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. People v. AmayaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State v. FitzpatrickMontana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. BohmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Pressley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API