Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Hantman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 21, 2005No. CIV.A.02-2552 (RWR/JMF)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.. This case has been referred to me by Judge Roberts for resolution of all discovery disputes pursuant to LCvR 72.2(a). Ready for resolution is Plaintiffs Motion for Discovery Sanctions (“Plains.Mot.”). For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion will be denied.
BACKGROUND
Frank Peterson (“Peterson” or “plaintiff’), an African-American, claims that the Architect of the Capitol (“AOC” or “defendant”) subjected him to a hostile work environment and denied him a promotion because of his race and in retaliation for complaining of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sharon Bonds v. District of Columbia and Director, District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Athridge v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Joseph C. Steffan v. Richard Cheney, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kemp v. HarrisDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Washington v. Thurgood Marshall AcademyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Meijer, Inc. V. Warner Chilcott Holdings Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Moore v. ChertoffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Caldwell v. Center for Correctional Health & Policy Studies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.