Legal Opinion

J.F. v. D.B.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2007No. 2006-0843PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} The procedural history of this case includes several court decisions in two states, but the relevant facts can be easily summarized. Eggs from a nonparty donor were artificially inseminated with semen from appellee, J.F., and implanted in appellant D.B., who subsequently gave birth to triplets. The triplets live with their biological father. Prior to these events, J.F., D.B., D.B.’s husband, also an appellant, and the egg donor had executed a gestational-surrogacy contract. The agreement provides that D.B. will “not attempt to form a parent-child relationship with any child conceived…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Baby M.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. SoloveOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Belsito v. ClarkSummit County Court of Common Pleas · 1994
  5. Doe v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re BabyTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Hill v. American Family Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Cincinnati City School District Board of Education v. ConnersOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Woodside Mgt. Co. v. BruexOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Lawless v. Lawrence Cty. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API