Legal Opinion
Belsito v. Clark
Summit County Court of Common Pleas
Decided November 14, 1994No. CJ94-09-05PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
W.F. Spicer, Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Plaintiffs, Anthony and Shelly Belsito, were married September 26, 1992. They decided they wanted a large family. Unfortunately, approximately one month prior to their marriage, Shelly had to undergo a hysterectomy as a result of recently discovered cervical cancer. Her physician had to remove her uterus, but was able to save her ovaries so that she could continue to produce eggs.
Carol S. Clark is Shelly’s younger sister. Around the same time as Shelly’s hysterectomy, Carol gave birth to her third child. Carol knew how much having a family meant to Shelly…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Matter of Baby M.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In re C.K.G.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- Raftopol v. RameySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Moreau v. Sylvester, Sylvester v. MoreauSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Culliton v. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- In Re Roberto D.B.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.